T109 Submittal and RFI response review
Submittal and RFI response review

Every pending submittal and open RFI on the Ridgeview Medical Office Building mechanical package, with the business days it has waited against the 10 business day response window, whose court it sits in, and what has to happen to get the air handling unit submittal at revision 2 answered. Prepared weekly by the Ironvale project engineer for the Brackenhurst Builders project manager and the design team.
Since Aug 20, Ironvale Mechanical has logged 18 submittals and 11 RFIs, 29 items in all. Twenty-two are answered. Seven are pending: 4 submittals and 3 RFIs. Two of the pending submittals are past the window, and both sit with the design team.
Sample template: the firm, people, clients and figures are fictional.
How long each item has waited
The window is 10 business days. The bars count business days from the day the item was logged as submitted to Sep 28. Anything above 10 is past the window. The air handling unit submittal at revision 2 is highlighted at 13 business days, and the hydronic pumps submittal follows at 11.
Live example from the Dashboards app, shown with Brackenhurst Builders' demo data. Block dates move forward each week, so they can differ from the sample dates on this page.
Submittals by state
Each square is one submittal. Fourteen are answered, 2 are pending inside the window and 2 are pending past it.
Live example from the Dashboards app, shown with Brackenhurst Builders' demo data.
Pending items and whose court they sit in
Waiting days are business days at Sep 28. The window ends 10 business days after the item was logged. RFIs are marked in the item name.
| Item | Drawing or spec | Waiting | Window ends | Court | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Air handling unit, revision 2 | Spec 23 73 00, sheet M-501 | 13 | Sep 23 | Design team, mechanical engineer | |
| Hydronic pumps | Spec 23 21 23, sheet M-401 | 11 | Sep 25 | Design team, mechanical engineer | |
| Roof curb elevation, RFI | Sheets A-301 and M-101 | 7 | Oct 1 | Design team, architect | |
| Variable air volume boxes | Spec 23 36 00 | 6 | Oct 2 | Design team, mechanical engineer | |
| Plumbing fixtures | Spec 22 40 00 | 4 | Oct 6 | Brackenhurst, review before it goes to the design team | |
| Fire damper access, RFI | Sheet M-202 | 4 | Oct 6 | Ironvale, sketch requested by the design team | |
| Slab sleeve locations, RFI | Sheet S-201 | 2 | Oct 8 | Brackenhurst, structural engineer through the project manager |
Four items sit with the design team, two with Brackenhurst and one with Ironvale. The roof curb elevation RFI reaches the end of its window on Oct 1, so it is the next item to turn red if no answer comes back.
The ceiling grid RFI is counted among the 8 answered RFIs as of the date of the email, but that answer went by email to the foreman and was never recorded, so it is not a field instruction until Brackenhurst resends it through the record. The field followed a response the office had not seen. Dominic Ostrowski ruled that only the recorded response is the field instruction, and he asked Brackenhurst to resend the answer through the record.
The response window
An answer that is not in the record is not an instruction. The crew follows the recorded response and nothing else.
Past the window
Air handling unit submittal, revision 2: 13 business days, 3 days past the window
Ironvale resubmitted the air handling unit at revision 2 on Sep 9. The window ended Sep 23, and no response has come back. The submittal sits with the design team's mechanical engineer.
What it holds up. Release for fabrication and the delivery date for the unit. The hydronic pumps submittal, at 11 business days, is the second item past the window and holds up the pump release. Consequence. Until both are answered, Ironvale cannot confirm equipment delivery dates for the mechanical rooms. Ask. The Brackenhurst project manager asks the design team for a recorded response on both before the Oct 9 look-ahead meeting.
Pending responses against the window
Each bar runs from the day the item was submitted to Sep 28. Weekends are skipped, so the length of a bar reads as business days. The red bars are the two items that crossed the 10 day line.
%%{init: {"gantt": {"useWidth": 920}}}%%
gantt
title Pending items, waiting time to Sep 28
dateFormat YYYY-MM-DD
axisFormat %b %d
excludes weekends
section Submittals
Air handling unit rev 2 :crit, s1, 2026-09-09, 2026-09-28
Hydronic pumps :crit, s2, 2026-09-11, 2026-09-28
Variable air volume boxes :s3, 2026-09-18, 2026-09-28
Plumbing fixtures :s4, 2026-09-22, 2026-09-28
section RFIs
Roof curb elevation :r1, 2026-09-17, 2026-09-28
Fire damper access :r2, 2026-09-22, 2026-09-28
Slab sleeve locations :r3, 2026-09-24, 2026-09-28
section Meetings
Look-ahead meeting :milestone, m1, 2026-10-09, 0d
Answered so far
Live example from the Dashboards app, shown with Brackenhurst Builders' demo data.
Next actions
How to use this template
Run this review every week from the log of submittals and RFIs. Count business days to the review date, name the court each pending item sits in, and put every item past the window in a callout with its consequence and ask.
| Variable | Meaning | Required |
|---|---|---|
{{project.name}} | Project and package the review covers | Required |
{{response.window_days}} | Required response window in business days | Required |
{{response.pending_rows}} | Pending submittals and RFIs with drawing, revision, days waiting and court | Required |
{{response.past_window_list}} | Items past the window with the work each one holds up | Required |
{{response.recorded_status}} | Whether each answer is recorded and in the field plan | Required |
{{response.answered_counts}} | Answered and logged counts for submittals and RFIs | Optional |
If a required value is missing, show Needs review in its place; never fill it with a guess. If the log cannot be read, show Unavailable instead of the counts.
The live Dashboards blocks on this page show the Brackenhurst Builders demo profile. Point each block at your own client's profile, or remove it, before you share the page.